top of page
NO ON PROP 50 FLYER (1).png

Subscribe to our newsletter

What Really Happened at the Capitol
and Why the Media Is Silent...

01

Redistricting Map Authors Hidden & Unconstitutional Process

California established an independent redistricting commission in 2010 to prevent partisan manipulation of congressional maps. The legislature is not supposed to draw or vote on these maps until voters approve changes via constitutional amendments like ACA 8 (Prop 50). Instead, undisclosed individuals drew maps prematurely, and the legislature rushed them to a vote and passed them. This is completely unconstitutional.

02

Gut-And-Amend Maneuver & Extreme Fast-Tracking

 The bills (ACA 8, SB 604, AB 270) were originally unrelated active bills that had undergone the 30-day public comment period. Lawmakers crossed out the original text and replaced it with entirely new redistricting language, a tactic known as gut-and-amend. Because of this, the bills were printed and introduced on a Monday and passed by Thursday, with Governor Newsom signing them in only four days. This bypassed normal legislative scrutiny and public input.

03

16,000 Public Comments Dismissed

Two Assemblymembers formally requested that 16,000 public comments be read into the record. The committee refused not only to read them but to even review them, openly stating this on the record. This was a direct denial of public participation.

04

Bill Language Withheld From Minority Party

Democrats were given access to the final redistricting bill language ahead of time, while the minority party were intentionally kept in the dark. This violates transparency and equal access in the legislative process.

05

Legislators Admitted They Don’t Read Bills 

Multiple members openly stated that they vote on bills without reading them first, undermining their constitutional duty to represent the people in an informed manner.

06

Openly Partisan Purpose & Manipulation

On record, committee members admitted that the intent of these bills was to reduce or eliminate minority party influence — proving the process is openly partisan and not about fair representation. The timing makes it worse: this was pushed through at the very end of the legislative session, just before the 2026 midterms. The maps are deliberately drawn to consolidate Democrat strongholds and eliminate five congressional seats. Committee members have publicly stated this was their goal, making the process not only partisan but fundamentally unlawful.

07

Justified Breaking Procedure

When challenged, members defended their actions by saying, “others did it before” or “times are different now.” They treated past misconduct as a precedent, instead of upholding the law.

08

Microphones Cut Off
 
When difficult questions were asked, committee members cut off the microphones, effectively silencing opposing voices, then rushed a vote without full discussion.

09

Fiscal Impact Summary

California is already facing a significant budget shortfall, with a projected $20 billion deficit for the 2025‑26 fiscal year. Prop 50 would add to this burden, with estimates suggesting the special election alone could cost taxpayers $200+ million. This means the state would be spending a massive sum on a partisan redistricting initiative while already struggling to cover essential services..

The Truth About Texas Redistricting

  • Texas was forced to redistrict because the Biden DOJ sued Galveston County and lost which changed the law thus making four Texas Congressional Districts unconstitutional.
     

  • When Texas drew its congressional districts in 2021, they created four congressional districts where they combined two minority communities to create a minority-majority district (Coalition minority districts).
     

  • On March 24, 2022, the Biden DOJ sued Galveston County Commissioners because Galveston did not draw a coalition minority district for the Black and Latino population.
     

  • On Aug. 1, 2024, the en banc panel of the Fifth Circuit concluded "that coalition claims do not comport with Section 2’s statutory language or with Supreme Court cases interpreting Section 2." The Fifth Circuit ruled coalition minority districts are unconstitutional.
     

  • On July 7, 2025, President Trump's DOJ sent a letter to Texas highlighting the 5th Circuit Order, pointing out that there are four coalition minority congressional districts that are now unconstitutional and that Texas needed to fix the problem.
     

  • Texas made a prudent choice to redraw the congressional districts so as to save their taxpayers the expense of litigating the losing case of defending minority coalition districts.
     

  • Texas did not have to redraw four minority coalitions districts because of President Trump. Texas had to redraw the lines because Biden sued Galveston County and the law was clarified that coalition minority districts were unconstitutional.
     

  • It is important to understand that the 2021 lines drawn by the California Independent Redistricting Commission have never been challenged in Court as unconstitutional because districts were drawn to create coalition minority districts.
     

  • Since Texas law requires that the Texas legislature draw the congressional districts, the Texas legislature followed the law.
     

  • However, the California Constitution prohibits the California legislature from drawing congressional districts and instead places that responsibility on the Independent Redistricting Commission.
     

  • To put Proposition 50 on the ballot for the voters of California to decide, the California legislature had to violate the California Constitution multiple times.
     

  • The California legislature is asking the voters of California to forgiven them for violating the California Constitution when they should have asked the voters for permission to draw the maps.
     

  • Two lawsuits were filed before the California Supreme Court asking the Court to stop Proposition 50 before it went to the voters because the California legislature violated the California Constitution.
     

  • Unfortunately, the California Supreme Court refused to require the California legislature to defend their unconstitutional acts and simply dismissed the Writ without even deciding the merits of the matter.

we the people

What a "No" Vote on Prop 50 Means

  • Upholding California's Constitutional Redistricting Process: Maintaining the current system where the Citizens Redistricting Commission, a 14-member independent body, is responsible for adjusting congressional district boundaries. This process ensures that redistricting is conducted transparently and without partisan influence. 

  • Preventing Legislative Overreach: Rejecting the proposed amendment that would allow the legislature to draw new congressional district maps, which could undermine the principles of fair representation and voter trust.

  • Protecting Voter Rights: Ensuring that any changes to district boundaries are made through a transparent, independent process rather than by political actors seeking to gain partisan advantage.

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." - Thomas Jefferson

GET INVOLVED With no on prop 50

JOIN THE MOVEMENT

bottom of page